The Path to 9-11
Remember the movie The Path to 9/11? Remember that the democrats threatened ABC’s broadcast license if they aired the movie? ABC finally edited the movie so that they could air it without the part that the Clinton administration didn’t want in there.
Hannity is going to air the unedited version on Sunday night on Fox.
Unseen footage from the controversial ABC docudrama The Path to 9/11 has been obtained by Fox News and will be shown Sunday on Hannity’s America.
The scene shows Sandy Berger, played by actor Devin Dunn, refusing to authorize an attack on Osama bin Laden despite a request from CIA officials, who said he was in their sights.
Berger was a national security adviser to President Clinton. The footage, which was expunged before it aired last September, was shown by the docudrama’s senior producer and writer/producer at a World Affairs Council event at California State University. The footage was shown as Fox cameras rolled.
It was interesting to me watching the news today. With the Sandy Berger/Clinton scandal swirling around – all the network news focused on was Carl Rove and counting the bodies of American Soldiers. That’s why I hate the network news.
The progressive blogs are predictably having a hissy fit. A quick look around the blogsphere and I can tell you they are having a bona fide meltdown. Remember how mad Clinton got when the movie first aired? The reaction is enough to let you know there is something they don’t want us to know.
Hot Air has the edited and unedited videos.
Suitably Flip wonders how Secretary Gonzales is coming with that polygraph.
After watching the videos at Hot Air Rounds Out wonders ….
I didn’t watch this when originally aired. But I can see now why the MSM was up in arms to the point of frenzy over this.
Do we really want more Clinton foreign policy?
The Hillary Project notes that Bill Clinton is still trying to obstruct the truth from being revealed regarding his unwillingness to deal with Osama bin Laden.
So has all this cover-up been to just protect Bill Clinton, or has this also been to protect Hillary’s chance of becoming President? The latter now seems more evident.
I am confident about one thing though, the really important part of the Fox broadcast won’t be the film footage that they show – it will be the subsequent interview with writer Cyrus Nowrasteh and former CIA agent Michael Scheuer. They will no doubt be very effective in defending their respective work in light of recent revelations. That part will be informative and potentially important.
Also at Bill Bites
January 27th, 2007 at 6:49 pm
Open Trackback Weekend #39…
It’s time once again for the open trackback party. Just leave a post and I’ll be sure to send a tb ping your way….
January 27th, 2007 at 8:19 pm
The Path To 9/11 Redux. Let’s Go Diving!…
In case you haven't heard about it, or, been sitting on a lake drinkin' and a fishin' most of the day (while the leftards did their little protests on a beautiful day!), taking one's Blackjack out every once and a while, Hannity is…
January 28th, 2007 at 9:06 pm
For an unsympathetic but deeply factual view on Sandy Berger’s malfeasance, see
SANDY BERGER SHOULD BE IN JAIL (Nimble Books, January 2007)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0978813855/ref=nosim
http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/sandy-berger-should-be-in-jail/
September 20th, 2009 at 9:41 pm
[...] Policy Prev/Next Posts Previous | Home | Next Friday, January 26th, 2007 at 8:54 [...]