<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rudy Giuliani and the Second Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steven merchant</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-97526</link>
		<dc:creator>steven merchant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-97526</guid>
		<description>What kind of name is blowback?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of name is blowback?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Bennett</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-80082</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-80082</guid>
		<description>If Rudy doesn't support the 2nd admendment verbatim then he won't get my vote. Nuff said!

                                                   Ben Bennett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Rudy doesn&#8217;t support the 2nd admendment verbatim then he won&#8217;t get my vote. Nuff said!</p>
<p>                                                   Ben Bennett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blowback</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-69810</link>
		<dc:creator>Blowback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-69810</guid>
		<description>I have a couple of issues with Rudy, in addition to his views on gun-control already mentioned; primary his view on terror, which is similar to the views that most of the other Republican candidates have.

The idea that "we're good, they're evil" is too simplistic and also happens to be inaccurate.  We are attacked by "terrorists" because the US has been sticking our nose around the world where it doesn't belong since the late 19th century (and in the Middle East as far back as the 1950s, maybe earlier).  We interfere with their internal affairs, we prop-up governments that oppress and kill people, and the citizens of these nations after decades of our government (the US) aiding their enemies and oppressors leaves them no choice but to attack us in the brutal ways that we do.

This is in no one condoning their actions.  But with any other violent crime, be it mugging, rape, or murder, it's always important to find a motive.  To say that these people are simply bread to hate Americans for no reason is absurd (sure, they are raised to hate Americans because of how miserable American policies have made their lives, but it certainly isn't "for no reason").

In 1953, we assisted the British in overthrowing the government of Iran.  The new dictator we put in place was instrumental in killing hundreds of thousands of people in the area.  In 1979, Iranian civilians retaliated.  In the 1980s, we were allies with Saddam Hussein (who was a murderous dictator).  In the 90s, we placed sanctions on Iraq that lead to the death of 300,000 due to starvation.

Now put yourself in their position.  If you were relatively small and weak against a powerful adversary like the United States, what would you do after decades of this?  You might resort something crazy like blowing yourself up in a crowded place just to help get your message across.  Of course, Rudy, with the help of the media, simply announce, "we're good, they're evil" and use it as an example of why our government needs to further restrict our freedoms to "protect" us from the "evil terrorists."

I say we stop meddling; bring the troops home from the Middle East and other countries and those countries deal with their own affairs.  We have enough problems in this country that we can spend our resources on without having to try and fix other countries.  If the government is going to steal my money via taxation, then the least they could do is use it to improve the quality of America.

If we stop killing them, they'll have no reason to hate us.

The only candidate, Republican or Democrat, that seems to get this is Ron Paul, so he has my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a couple of issues with Rudy, in addition to his views on gun-control already mentioned; primary his view on terror, which is similar to the views that most of the other Republican candidates have.</p>
<p>The idea that &#8220;we&#8217;re good, they&#8217;re evil&#8221; is too simplistic and also happens to be inaccurate.  We are attacked by &#8220;terrorists&#8221; because the US has been sticking our nose around the world where it doesn&#8217;t belong since the late 19th century (and in the Middle East as far back as the 1950s, maybe earlier).  We interfere with their internal affairs, we prop-up governments that oppress and kill people, and the citizens of these nations after decades of our government (the US) aiding their enemies and oppressors leaves them no choice but to attack us in the brutal ways that we do.</p>
<p>This is in no one condoning their actions.  But with any other violent crime, be it mugging, rape, or murder, it&#8217;s always important to find a motive.  To say that these people are simply bread to hate Americans for no reason is absurd (sure, they are raised to hate Americans because of how miserable American policies have made their lives, but it certainly isn&#8217;t &#8220;for no reason&#8221;).</p>
<p>In 1953, we assisted the British in overthrowing the government of Iran.  The new dictator we put in place was instrumental in killing hundreds of thousands of people in the area.  In 1979, Iranian civilians retaliated.  In the 1980s, we were allies with Saddam Hussein (who was a murderous dictator).  In the 90s, we placed sanctions on Iraq that lead to the death of 300,000 due to starvation.</p>
<p>Now put yourself in their position.  If you were relatively small and weak against a powerful adversary like the United States, what would you do after decades of this?  You might resort something crazy like blowing yourself up in a crowded place just to help get your message across.  Of course, Rudy, with the help of the media, simply announce, &#8220;we&#8217;re good, they&#8217;re evil&#8221; and use it as an example of why our government needs to further restrict our freedoms to &#8220;protect&#8221; us from the &#8220;evil terrorists.&#8221;</p>
<p>I say we stop meddling; bring the troops home from the Middle East and other countries and those countries deal with their own affairs.  We have enough problems in this country that we can spend our resources on without having to try and fix other countries.  If the government is going to steal my money via taxation, then the least they could do is use it to improve the quality of America.</p>
<p>If we stop killing them, they&#8217;ll have no reason to hate us.</p>
<p>The only candidate, Republican or Democrat, that seems to get this is Ron Paul, so he has my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Layla</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-58600</link>
		<dc:creator>Layla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-58600</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your concern about gun control.  But when I look at the other candidates - on both sides - for be the bigger issue than gun control or a woman's right to choose becomes the war on terror.  At this point I trust none of them but Rudy to stand up for our country and citizenry and fight this war full force.  He proved that during and in the wake of 9/11.  The man is selfless, loves people and loves this nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your concern about gun control.  But when I look at the other candidates - on both sides - for be the bigger issue than gun control or a woman&#8217;s right to choose becomes the war on terror.  At this point I trust none of them but Rudy to stand up for our country and citizenry and fight this war full force.  He proved that during and in the wake of 9/11.  The man is selfless, loves people and loves this nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Dondero</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-55027</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Dondero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-55027</guid>
		<description>Hey, many of us libertarians are really upset with Rudy for his stance on prostitition laws.  This is a big issue with us.  We libertarians are diehard prostitution legalization advocates.  For me, being an ex-Sailor, it's a very important issue. 

But I'm looking past it.  I will support Rudy all the way, because there's more important issues out there like fighting the War on Islamo-Fascism.

I hope to meet Rudy one day, to have the opportunity to explain to him why legalized prostitution would be a better stance.  But it's not critical to my support.

Eric Dondero, CEO
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, many of us libertarians are really upset with Rudy for his stance on prostitition laws.  This is a big issue with us.  We libertarians are diehard prostitution legalization advocates.  For me, being an ex-Sailor, it&#8217;s a very important issue. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m looking past it.  I will support Rudy all the way, because there&#8217;s more important issues out there like fighting the War on Islamo-Fascism.</p>
<p>I hope to meet Rudy one day, to have the opportunity to explain to him why legalized prostitution would be a better stance.  But it&#8217;s not critical to my support.</p>
<p>Eric Dondero, CEO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-54680</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-54680</guid>
		<description>I think he would be an outstanding member of any administration, that he has a lot to offer, but not as president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he would be an outstanding member of any administration, that he has a lot to offer, but not as president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Ox</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-54650</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Ox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 05:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/20/rudy-giuliani-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-54650</guid>
		<description>His positions on moral matters in general are all part and parcel of his anti-conservative agenda.  I'd never trust him.  Better a Hillary who will be accountable than a Rudy from our own camp!  Frankly, I hope it doesn't come to that.  I hope the Republicans will get Fred Thompson or Rick Santorum (or both) on the ticket!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His positions on moral matters in general are all part and parcel of his anti-conservative agenda.  I&#8217;d never trust him.  Better a Hillary who will be accountable than a Rudy from our own camp!  Frankly, I hope it doesn&#8217;t come to that.  I hope the Republicans will get Fred Thompson or Rick Santorum (or both) on the ticket!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
