Hollywood puffy boy and mediocre actor Carlos Estevez aka Charlie Sheen is set to narrate a new release of the conspiracy theory internet movie Loose Change. As most of you probably know, Loose Change is an extreme left-wing movie that presents a lot of made up ‘facts’ to prove the American government is really responsible for the attacks of September 11, 2001.
Sheen is calling for a new independent probe into the 9/11 attacks.
From the New York Post, Page Six
March 22, 2007 — SOME celebrities don’t know when to keep their traps shut - like Charlie Sheen and Rosie O’Donnell, who are throwing their weight behind the twisted theory that the United States government was behind the 9/11 terror attacks.
Page Six has learned that Sheen, the hooker-loving Hollywood hunk, has agreed to narrate a new version of the loopy YouTube documentary “Loose Change,” which claims that a corrupt faction within the federal government orchestrated the mass murder at the World Trade Center.
Sources say Sheen - whose father, Martin Sheen, has been arrested 63 times protesting on behalf of various leftist causes - is in talks with Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban’s Magnolia Pictures to distribute “Loose Change.” Sheen has called for a new independent probe of the attack, telling Alex Jones’ radio show: “It seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75 percent of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions.”
Sheen’s rep confirmed his participation. Cuban e-mailed us: “We are having discussions about distributing the existing video with Charlie’s involvement as a narrator, not in making a new feature. We are also looking for productions with an opposing viewpoint. We like controversial subjects, but we are agnostic to which side the controversy comes from.”
Meanwhile, on her blog, O’Donnell has pasted in a widely debunked rundown of the collapse of 7 World Trade Center from the whatreallyhappened.com Web site, created by conspiracy theorist Matt Rivero.
O’Donnell repeats his discredited theories, which include the notion that because the fires were not evenly distributed, it made the building’s perfect collapse into its footprint “impossible that landlord Larry Silverstein told the FDNY that “the smartest thing to do is pull it,” a phrase conspiracy theorists take to mean that he ordered the skyscraper’s destruction; and that firefighters withdrawing from the building feared it was going to “blow up.”
O’Donnell’s rep declined comment.
Rosie is in on this too??? Well, that gives it credibility!! HA!
March 25th, 2007 at 9:12 pm
Give it a rest, Jaguar. There was no conspiracy, there was nothing funny going on. Drop your insane leftism and join us here in the real world.
BSC: I think it makes them feel less scared if they can convince themselves it’s us instead of them that are the bad guys. If we are the bad guys they are pretty safe and the world isn’t such a scary place. I don’t know - do you think they are too far gone? I think maybe these are.
March 25th, 2007 at 10:43 pm
WT Blackbeard and Beth - If you’re in the Death Star II neighborhood, Frau Vader will make us a German dinner, and I’ll break out the 9-11-01 VCR Tapes that I recorded in September 2001. Don’t tell Jaguar BS, but I’ll show you the CBS television special from a French news crew that was filming NYC firefighters in downtown Manhattan for one of their firefighter documentaries that actually shows American Airline Flight 11 (Mohamad Atta) flying over them and directly INTO the WTC North Tower! It’s OUR secret, but please don’t tell Jaguar about it. As for Celestial Moon Unit Jasmine - I don’t think Pope Benedict XVI will ever hear her CONFESSIONS! Ignore the Vagina Monologue Children of the Corny Beth! I feel sorry for her type and for her parents as well. We raise ours differently - with God, Family and Country in our hearts, souls and minds. God bless and go to bed early Jasmine for you’re GROUNDED and no FRUIT CUP for dessert. You’re excused! Jasmine should be seen and not heard? WT - have a great conservative Carolina week and sorry about G’town’s victory over NC buddy.
March 26th, 2007 at 11:06 pm
Notice how they attack charlie sheen’s character in the artical rather than argue the theories presented. “the hooker-loving Hollywood hunk”…this is used by all of western media as a way to discredit the individual so that what he/she says is discredited as well before it can ever be discussed. I find it very strange that 911 truth seekers are the ones begging for open rational debate while every media outlet in the US and UK would rather not discuss the topic, and when they do it is purely fueled by immature, childish name-calling. It can be quite scary when CNN and FOX News agree on something.
March 27th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
I have seen the pictures of the damages done to the pentagon. I saw them the day this accident happened. I guess I am a little confused……..I work for an airline, I have been to crash sights of airlines….what I cant figure out is, why was there tail, or wings on the ground after the impact?
Why was there not a bigger explosion? With as much fuel as was on the plane, there should have been more damage. The cars on the freeway should have been rumbled……
If you take a look at what happened at the Oklahoma City Bombing incident, buildings miles away had their windows blasted out….why didnt the stores across the street have any damage at all?
I saw a hole. I saw a small hole. nothing like a huge airliner would have made. To me it looks like damage a missle may cause.
I am not an expert by any means. It just seems strange that there was no airplane around after the damages to the pentagon occured.
Well, I dont know what happened except a lot of people died that day. But the question is…..if the plane didnt hit the pentagon……where are all the passengers on the plane?
April 1st, 2007 at 11:51 am
According to an investigator from the the National Science Foundation, who examined and tested steel samples from WTC Building #7, the samples had “evaporated” and appeared “paper thin”. He equated the appearance of the steel to that of ice as it melts to paper thin thickness during a Spring thaw. He found this to be incredible and had no explanation for it. He stated that the investigation of what caused this steel to “evaporate” is very important to the engineering profession. (October 16, 2001). Also, NIST had hired a private contractor to examine the collapse of Building 7. This has yet to be completed. Why is this so controversial? Why did that guy from the Partidge Family (Danny)insist that Rosie should be hanged by the neck until she be dead for speaking of the collapse of building 7, among other issues?
The cause of the collapse of building 7 is important enough that OUR taxpayer dollars are being paid to NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) now (March 31, 2007) in order to examine the collapse, so any questions regarding the collapse ARE legitimate, aren’t they?
April 4th, 2007 at 10:40 am
“the loopy YouTube documentary “Loose Change,â€Â???????
Why is it “loopy”? Because you haven’t seen it and you’re going by what you heard?…If you saw it, you wouldn’t say it….On top of that, how much credibility can go to someone who uses the word “loopy”? Thanks gramps!
The truth is coming out and it’s going to be great to sit back and watch you idiots cry about how you were lied to by the government….the truth will come out!
BSC: It must be terrible to be as scared as you obviously are.
BTW, I quoted Page Six that used the word ‘loopy’. A quote is when you take something some one else writes and use that to make a point. Quotes are identified and credit given to the original author. I’ve never been prone to use the word ‘loopy’, but it seems like a perfectly good word to me. It certainly conveys the point that the author of that piece was trying to make. Do you have something against ‘loopy’ as a word?
April 26th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
WOW…My question is does it really matter if you’re “left-wing” or “right-wing”? The facts of 9/11…no matter which theory you believe in…are definitely sketchy. Maybe Dylan’ theory isn’t 100%, but do you honestly believe everything the government says is true? Part of our rights as American citizens is the right to question our government and receive REAL answers. Has anyone noticed the lack of REAL answers here?
Like stated above many people (smart people too) question the events of that day. I myself believe that our government is no different than any other - they are all run but “men” (by men I mean human beings). Men are bith good and evil by nature. Our govenment is full of very powerful, rich people that some of which are definitively known to have suspicious connections. We would be stupid to not question this? Even if it turns out the whole truth was told to us. Because it is our RIGHT as Americans. To the above idiot talking about how they’re lucky they don’t live in China…You are not very smart, and for that I pity you. But it must be nice to live in a world so easy and non-questioning of the world around you. Maybe YOU should pack up and move to one of the countries you mentioned. You obviously do not believe in excercising your American rights; (except to talk nonsense), so do us all a favor and get on the soonest flight out of our country.
Dani
July 6th, 2007 at 1:19 am
LINDASOG, you are so unaware.
If the government killed the film makers that would jepordize their plan more so than not killing them. Let them make these films, lots of people will that is a understood reprocusion of any mission. it MAY cause doubt, but thats it.
If you go deeper into Free Maysons and the illuminati, this is highly possible.
Im not saying it is but do not be ignorant, be open.
the biggest money wheel for the US is the US military.
It both creates $$ as well as protects it. ill stop here. but the governement likes people as yourself.
I love our government, but i still keep a watchful eye on it, you should too.
September 14th, 2007 at 1:04 am
Ya know, when I watched the film…it was split into 3 parts. I was really hanging on to parts 1 and 2…but when it got to part 3 I was feeling it to be bogus…atleast those parts. I think he has alot of gall to say that the cell phone calls were bogus. To even say that, that is harsh. There are families who talked with their spouses, kids, brothers/sisters on flight 93, and for that film to say those calls were not real…that is just awful! That is the main thing that urked me the most.
September 24th, 2007 at 6:44 pm
people!,if loose change 911 werent real facts would they still be able to be published? c mon, belive it,our government screwed us this time and let us not forget about the JFK theory.