<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Troops Would Have Fought Iranian Captors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-6/#comment-139692</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-139692</guid>
		<description>The so called elite Royal marines surrendering without a fight I'm ashamed to be British,I can't believe they gave in without a fight to a bunch of hooligans in  couple poorly equipped rubber boats,I certainly can't imagine the U.S marines doing the same,they would have fought and been victorious even if some of them died they would have honoured their unit and they country unlike our wimpish Royal marines,I'm sure even female U.S marines would have done better than ours,now how can our American cousins take our forces seriously and rely on us in  future conflicts,when we look so pathetically week and stupid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The so called elite Royal marines surrendering without a fight I&#8217;m ashamed to be British,I can&#8217;t believe they gave in without a fight to a bunch of hooligans in  couple poorly equipped rubber boats,I certainly can&#8217;t imagine the U.S marines doing the same,they would have fought and been victorious even if some of them died they would have honoured their unit and they country unlike our wimpish Royal marines,I&#8217;m sure even female U.S marines would have done better than ours,now how can our American cousins take our forces seriously and rely on us in  future conflicts,when we look so pathetically week and stupid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-6/#comment-56835</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 18:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-56835</guid>
		<description>quote: "The British Navy defeated the Spanish Armada for crying out loud."

It took the Dutch and the fabulous Brits to take down the Spanish Armada.  Without the earlier Dutch victories, the Armada would have taken much longer to remove as the dominant force.

Interesting parallel to our present "allied" situation in the Gulf.  Americans going to rhetoric -what is done under American ROE... hopefully this Iranian bullshit will change things for the future, and let them know some good ol' Western rounds may be coming their way if they pull off any more illegal (have they disputed British GPS records yet?) crap.  I wish there had been a fight, perhaps selfishly, because I was not there surrounded by bad guys.

I am American, have been to Gulf many times in US Navy.  These buggers need some rounds sent their way when they break the rules.  We used to do that to Iran when they screwed up.  Why so chicken shit now?  

I know all about Iranian "swarm" tactics.  They are the best in the world at it, been doing it for over 20 years.  Brit/US knows it in-depth.  But we are still using cold-war big-asset tactics against cheap little boats full of punks.  Unbelievable.  

I am so tired of rhetoric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote: &#8220;The British Navy defeated the Spanish Armada for crying out loud.&#8221;</p>
<p>It took the Dutch and the fabulous Brits to take down the Spanish Armada.  Without the earlier Dutch victories, the Armada would have taken much longer to remove as the dominant force.</p>
<p>Interesting parallel to our present &#8220;allied&#8221; situation in the Gulf.  Americans going to rhetoric -what is done under American ROE&#8230; hopefully this Iranian bullshit will change things for the future, and let them know some good ol&#8217; Western rounds may be coming their way if they pull off any more illegal (have they disputed British GPS records yet?) crap.  I wish there had been a fight, perhaps selfishly, because I was not there surrounded by bad guys.</p>
<p>I am American, have been to Gulf many times in US Navy.  These buggers need some rounds sent their way when they break the rules.  We used to do that to Iran when they screwed up.  Why so chicken shit now?  </p>
<p>I know all about Iranian &#8220;swarm&#8221; tactics.  They are the best in the world at it, been doing it for over 20 years.  Brit/US knows it in-depth.  But we are still using cold-war big-asset tactics against cheap little boats full of punks.  Unbelievable.  </p>
<p>I am so tired of rhetoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-5/#comment-56203</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-56203</guid>
		<description>Yeah man!  Bomb them!  Otherwise they will be held for years!  Oh wait -- they've been released!  You people amaze me.  Shoot first, ask questions later -- morons.

&lt;font color="blue"&gt;BSC: 'you people'?? Who is 'you people'? Oh, and, the end of the story hasn't been written.&lt;/font&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah man!  Bomb them!  Otherwise they will be held for years!  Oh wait &#8212; they&#8217;ve been released!  You people amaze me.  Shoot first, ask questions later &#8212; morons.</p>
<p><font color="blue">BSC: &#8216;you people&#8217;?? Who is &#8216;you people&#8217;? Oh, and, the end of the story hasn&#8217;t been written.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Star Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-5/#comment-55630</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Star Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 01:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55630</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Alas, the Sun Has Set on the British Empire...&lt;/strong&gt;

The country that brought you Admiral Lord Nelson, The Duke of Wellington, the RAF pilots, the Knights of the Round Table is now exhibiting the rebirth of a Neville Chamberlain-like appeasement policy.
&#8216;Peace in our time.&#8217; Chamberlain declar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Alas, the Sun Has Set on the British Empire&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The country that brought you Admiral Lord Nelson, The Duke of Wellington, the RAF pilots, the Knights of the Round Table is now exhibiting the rebirth of a Neville Chamberlain-like appeasement policy.<br />
&#8216;Peace in our time.&#8217; Chamberlain declar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Guinness</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-5/#comment-55351</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Guinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55351</guid>
		<description>Fair Play Beth, I'll stand down.  The rules of engagement are exactly that though, rules unfortunately we have to play by.  If the ROE allowed them to engage, then believe me it would have happened.  However like you eluded to, our hands are handcuff.

As for the history of the 'Irish Struggle' I could bore you death with it all; that could be a decent thread on it's own.  For now lets hope this current situation ends soon, another front in the war on terror being opened is the last thing both our nations need.

&lt;font color="blue"&gt;BSC: Ted, I agree, none of us want another front in this war opened. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be up to us. THEY want it opened and are thumbing their noses at us. If their aggressions go unanswered it will only get worse. History teaches us that.&lt;/font&gt;

&lt;font color="blue"&gt;btw - no need to stand down. I'm just saying, we are on the same side. I'm ANGRY out guys hands are tied by what I perceive to be unreasonable ROE. It's bad for their morale and it puts them in untenable situations with an enemy who knows they won't/can't fight back.&lt;/font&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair Play Beth, I&#8217;ll stand down.  The rules of engagement are exactly that though, rules unfortunately we have to play by.  If the ROE allowed them to engage, then believe me it would have happened.  However like you eluded to, our hands are handcuff.</p>
<p>As for the history of the &#8216;Irish Struggle&#8217; I could bore you death with it all; that could be a decent thread on it&#8217;s own.  For now lets hope this current situation ends soon, another front in the war on terror being opened is the last thing both our nations need.</p>
<p><font color="blue">BSC: Ted, I agree, none of us want another front in this war opened. Unfortunately, it doesn&#8217;t seem to be up to us. THEY want it opened and are thumbing their noses at us. If their aggressions go unanswered it will only get worse. History teaches us that.</font></p>
<p><font color="blue">btw - no need to stand down. I&#8217;m just saying, we are on the same side. I&#8217;m ANGRY out guys hands are tied by what I perceive to be unreasonable ROE. It&#8217;s bad for their morale and it puts them in untenable situations with an enemy who knows they won&#8217;t/can&#8217;t fight back.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaning Straight Up</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-5/#comment-55332</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaning Straight Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55332</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More Nutroot Derangement.  Todays victim: Tony Snow...&lt;/strong&gt;

How people can live with such inner hatred and bitterness, &#160;I will never understand. 
 
And the scary thing is that this is fairly mild for the HuffPo, but still, how can anyone even go there? How can you make such rude and idiotic statements?&amp;n...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More Nutroot Derangement.  Todays victim: Tony Snow&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>How people can live with such inner hatred and bitterness, &nbsp;I will never understand. </p>
<p>And the scary thing is that this is fairly mild for the HuffPo, but still, how can anyone even go there? How can you make such rude and idiotic statements?&amp;n&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaning Straight Up</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-5/#comment-55330</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaning Straight Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55330</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Congressional Pork Show moves to over the Senate, plus a House Pork total correction...&lt;/strong&gt;

I always publish retractions and corrections when&#160;I am wrong, and I was in my blog yesterday.&#160; I said the House bill had over 6.4 Billion in pork spending.&#160; I was wrong. 
 
It is actually over&#160;20 billion.&#160; My bad. 
 
 
  C...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Congressional Pork Show moves to over the Senate, plus a House Pork total correction&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I always publish retractions and corrections when&nbsp;I am wrong, and I was in my blog yesterday.&nbsp; I said the House bill had over 6.4 Billion in pork spending.&nbsp; I was wrong. </p>
<p>It is actually over&nbsp;20 billion.&nbsp; My bad. </p>
<p>  C&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woman Honor Thyself</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-5/#comment-55317</link>
		<dc:creator>Woman Honor Thyself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55317</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Israel: Set an Example wouldya?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Condi has joined the ranks with her pansy leftist dribble about how disengagement means more peace .
Blah frikkin Blah.

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Israel: Set an Example wouldya?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Condi has joined the ranks with her pansy leftist dribble about how disengagement means more peace .<br />
Blah frikkin Blah.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planck's Constant</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-5/#comment-55297</link>
		<dc:creator>Planck's Constant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55297</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Theodore Roosevelt criticizes Liberal Idiots...&lt;/strong&gt;

I don't understand why liberals object to being called unpatriotic; after all, they hate everything that America stands for. Damn it, if you're a traitor, stand tall and announce it proudly. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Theodore Roosevelt criticizes Liberal Idiots&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why liberals object to being called unpatriotic; after all, they hate everything that America stands for. Damn it, if you&#8217;re a traitor, stand tall and announce it proudly. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-5/#comment-55295</link>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55295</guid>
		<description>Agreed Anna - you said that much less wordy than me!  ]:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed Anna - you said that much less wordy than me!  ]:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-5/#comment-55294</link>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55294</guid>
		<description>Ted and Bernie - we are on the same side here, boys!!!!

Ted, don't you think there is a possibility that we have had more casualties because we have more Troops in the Middle East? I don't know what the stats are in terms of percentages, but I think that would be a more accurate assessment.

Friendly fire incidents happen in all wars, as you know. And they don't just happen on the American side. No one wants that. Please also take into account that those friendly fire incidents occurred while American planes were providing air cover for the British and/or Canadian operations on the ground. Had the Brits or Canadians been providing air cover it could have just as easily been the other way around.

Ted, I NEVER said nor do I believe that the British are cowardly. I would never even think that. They, of all people, have a history of standing for good against evil. The British stood alone against the Germans in WWII for a very long time - and survived! There is nothing cowardly about the British. I have mostly British blood (and Scot-Irish, of course - but not Shanty Irish! lol).

What bothers ME is that those men were sent out without proper orders to protect themselves and without cover. That is what bothers me.

The rules of engagement are such that our guys (and even more so yours) are handicapped in fighting this enemy. They would not be so aggressive towards us if they knew we'd unleash our power against them. They are no where near as good Soldiers as our boys are. They know it, so they count on the fact that we value life and honor the decent treatment of fellow human beings. They use that against us.

You bring up the IRA and use the line 'One mans freedom fighter is anotherÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s terrorist. That's the same ol' argument the left always uses, which leaves me wondering if you are just repeating the talking points.

The difference is who are our enemies. I'm sure the SS felt that God was on their side. Every army does. But that doesn't mean we have to choose that side.

I'm sure the jihadists are quite sure that allah wants them to fly planes into our buildings, push Israel into the sea and kill Americans and Jews (and British, btw). That doesn't make them right.

Are they terrorists or freedom fighters? Who cares - they are my enemies. Sometimes you have to chose a side. Sometimes it really matters which side you chose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted and Bernie - we are on the same side here, boys!!!!</p>
<p>Ted, don&#8217;t you think there is a possibility that we have had more casualties because we have more Troops in the Middle East? I don&#8217;t know what the stats are in terms of percentages, but I think that would be a more accurate assessment.</p>
<p>Friendly fire incidents happen in all wars, as you know. And they don&#8217;t just happen on the American side. No one wants that. Please also take into account that those friendly fire incidents occurred while American planes were providing air cover for the British and/or Canadian operations on the ground. Had the Brits or Canadians been providing air cover it could have just as easily been the other way around.</p>
<p>Ted, I NEVER said nor do I believe that the British are cowardly. I would never even think that. They, of all people, have a history of standing for good against evil. The British stood alone against the Germans in WWII for a very long time - and survived! There is nothing cowardly about the British. I have mostly British blood (and Scot-Irish, of course - but not Shanty Irish! lol).</p>
<p>What bothers ME is that those men were sent out without proper orders to protect themselves and without cover. That is what bothers me.</p>
<p>The rules of engagement are such that our guys (and even more so yours) are handicapped in fighting this enemy. They would not be so aggressive towards us if they knew we&#8217;d unleash our power against them. They are no where near as good Soldiers as our boys are. They know it, so they count on the fact that we value life and honor the decent treatment of fellow human beings. They use that against us.</p>
<p>You bring up the IRA and use the line &#8216;One mans freedom fighter is anotherÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s terrorist. That&#8217;s the same ol&#8217; argument the left always uses, which leaves me wondering if you are just repeating the talking points.</p>
<p>The difference is who are our enemies. I&#8217;m sure the SS felt that God was on their side. Every army does. But that doesn&#8217;t mean we have to choose that side.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the jihadists are quite sure that allah wants them to fly planes into our buildings, push Israel into the sea and kill Americans and Jews (and British, btw). That doesn&#8217;t make them right.</p>
<p>Are they terrorists or freedom fighters? Who cares - they are my enemies. Sometimes you have to chose a side. Sometimes it really matters which side you chose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-5/#comment-55293</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55293</guid>
		<description>I cannot imagine that the British military feel their government has their back when they are not even allowed to defend themselves against attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot imagine that the British military feel their government has their back when they are not even allowed to defend themselves against attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Guinness</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-4/#comment-55288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Guinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55288</guid>
		<description>Bernie - Your acts of shoot first ask questions later speak for themselves:
1991 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ 9 British Soldiers killed by US A10
2002 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ 4 Canadian Soldiers killed by USN F16
2003 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ 1 British Soldier killed by US A10

Out of interest, the policy I so admire is that of intelligent warfare.  By the way, I am a Royal Marines Commando, with 19 years of service including operational experience.  Therefore, I do take offence to your use of the word Ã¢â‚¬ËœcowardlyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢.  Which is a word I would use for the large number of so called Irish Americans, who financially supported the IRA armed struggle in Northern Ireland and main land Great Britain for over thirty years (One mans freedom fighter is anotherÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s terrorist).  

In addition, those captured are my ownÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ Fellow Royal Marines, so believe me your use of word Ã¢â‚¬ËœCowardlyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ is a slur on those men (and woman) currently held by Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernie - Your acts of shoot first ask questions later speak for themselves:<br />
1991 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ 9 British Soldiers killed by US A10<br />
2002 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ 4 Canadian Soldiers killed by USN F16<br />
2003 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ 1 British Soldier killed by US A10</p>
<p>Out of interest, the policy I so admire is that of intelligent warfare.  By the way, I am a Royal Marines Commando, with 19 years of service including operational experience.  Therefore, I do take offence to your use of the word Ã¢â‚¬ËœcowardlyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢.  Which is a word I would use for the large number of so called Irish Americans, who financially supported the IRA armed struggle in Northern Ireland and main land Great Britain for over thirty years (One mans freedom fighter is anotherÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s terrorist).  </p>
<p>In addition, those captured are my ownÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ Fellow Royal Marines, so believe me your use of word Ã¢â‚¬ËœCowardlyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ is a slur on those men (and woman) currently held by Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Florida Masochist</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-4/#comment-55279</link>
		<dc:creator>The Florida Masochist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55279</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Knucklehead of the Day award...&lt;/strong&gt;

Today's winner is The New York Times....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Knucklehead of the Day award&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s winner is The New York Times&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernie</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-4/#comment-55278</link>
		<dc:creator>bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55278</guid>
		<description>Ted Guinness, your cowardly tactic of think before shooting will only lead to more and more brazen acts by the Iranians.  Jimmy Carter used this tactic when our hostages were taken in 79 which led to the Soviets invading Afghanistan because he was too careful, or as the Iranians gleefully said then, "America will do nothing."

Our doing nothing eventually led to all other attacks on America during Clinton's "think before shooting" regime.  That worked well for us, do you think?

Your clever "thinking before shooting" in 1979 led directly to almost 3000 American deaths.  You are right.  In that very instant when you surrender there might be, might be, some deaths; but the policy you so admire only leads to eventual, certain death in even greater numbers.  

Hezbollah has been completely re-armed by Iran yet they hesitate to kidnap another Israeli soldier.  Why not?  I'm certain they would love to do it again.  Could it be that the last disproportionate response is holding them back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Guinness, your cowardly tactic of think before shooting will only lead to more and more brazen acts by the Iranians.  Jimmy Carter used this tactic when our hostages were taken in 79 which led to the Soviets invading Afghanistan because he was too careful, or as the Iranians gleefully said then, &#8220;America will do nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Our doing nothing eventually led to all other attacks on America during Clinton&#8217;s &#8220;think before shooting&#8221; regime.  That worked well for us, do you think?</p>
<p>Your clever &#8220;thinking before shooting&#8221; in 1979 led directly to almost 3000 American deaths.  You are right.  In that very instant when you surrender there might be, might be, some deaths; but the policy you so admire only leads to eventual, certain death in even greater numbers.  </p>
<p>Hezbollah has been completely re-armed by Iran yet they hesitate to kidnap another Israeli soldier.  Why not?  I&#8217;m certain they would love to do it again.  Could it be that the last disproportionate response is holding them back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Guinness</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-4/#comment-55275</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Guinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55275</guid>
		<description>Yep, your damm right Americans would have fought back, and guess what, more than likely be killed.  Thankfully we think before we shoot, maybe if you thought abit more you'd have alot less dead American soldiers.

Believe it or not you don't need a sledge hammer to crack an egg!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, your damm right Americans would have fought back, and guess what, more than likely be killed.  Thankfully we think before we shoot, maybe if you thought abit more you&#8217;d have alot less dead American soldiers.</p>
<p>Believe it or not you don&#8217;t need a sledge hammer to crack an egg!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam's Blog</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-4/#comment-55259</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 05:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55259</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Truth and Hope Report: Monday Night Talk...&lt;/strong&gt;

Tonight on the Truth and Hope Report, I talk about:

-Why I decided to get a MySpace Account
-Why Mitt Romney is falling like a rock.
-Why Fred Thompson ought to come clean about his less than stellar past position on abortion
-The Religion of L.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Truth and Hope Report: Monday Night Talk&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Tonight on the Truth and Hope Report, I talk about:</p>
<p>-Why I decided to get a MySpace Account<br />
-Why Mitt Romney is falling like a rock.<br />
-Why Fred Thompson ought to come clean about his less than stellar past position on abortion<br />
-The Religion of L&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woman Honor Thyself</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-4/#comment-55257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woman Honor Thyself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 04:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55257</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ah, some CouragE Finally...&lt;/strong&gt;

The widow of a man killed in the Madrid bombings attended the trial of IslÃ¢â‚¬â€œamic radicals with a cartoon of the prophet Moh-am-med with a bomb on her T-shirt.
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ah, some CouragE Finally&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The widow of a man killed in the Madrid bombings attended the trial of IslÃ¢â‚¬â€œamic radicals with a cartoon of the prophet Moh-am-med with a bomb on her T-shirt.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mullah Cimoc</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-4/#comment-55256</link>
		<dc:creator>Mullah Cimoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 04:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55256</guid>
		<description>Mullah Cimoc say ameriki in this big troubling time now because him thinking his dick so big, but not so big after all.

big bragger have the small dick.  but the ameriki soldier not so stupid for commit the suicide by resist the overwhelming force.

him wait for come home realize fight for nothing except master in tel aviv then him looking for the rope for end the guilty and the shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mullah Cimoc say ameriki in this big troubling time now because him thinking his dick so big, but not so big after all.</p>
<p>big bragger have the small dick.  but the ameriki soldier not so stupid for commit the suicide by resist the overwhelming force.</p>
<p>him wait for come home realize fight for nothing except master in tel aviv then him looking for the rope for end the guilty and the shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Voices</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/comment-page-4/#comment-55246</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Voices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/03/26/us-troops-would-have-fought-iranian-captors/#comment-55246</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rosie Still Ignorant And A Liar, Gals Are Shunning Her, and Joe Scarborough Seems to be Right about Barbara Walters...&lt;/strong&gt;

Yes, Liar!Ã‚Â  On today&#8217;s show she said:
&#8220;But interesting with the British sailors, there were 15 British sailors and Marines who apparently went into Iranian waters and they were seized by the Iranians. And I have one thing to say: Gulf of T...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rosie Still Ignorant And A Liar, Gals Are Shunning Her, and Joe Scarborough Seems to be Right about Barbara Walters&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Yes, Liar!Ã‚Â  On today&#8217;s show she said:<br />
&#8220;But interesting with the British sailors, there were 15 British sailors and Marines who apparently went into Iranian waters and they were seized by the Iranians. And I have one thing to say: Gulf of T&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
