Comments on: Peace Mother Sheehan Threatens to Oust Nancy Pelosi

By: Michael Moore has at Wolf Blitzer, CNN and the Main Stream Media » Blue Star Chronicles

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:57:34 +0000

[...] recently we see Peace Mother Sheehan threatening Nancy Pelosi if she doesn’t comply with the demands of that part of the [...]

By: j. williams

j. williams — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:26:17 +0000

Cindy Shehan put the anti war movement on the map and gave it a face and reason to exist. When she ‘retired’ to tend to her remaining children the public believed her and it was the right move. This threat is the wrong move. It is wrong because she appears to be turning her back on her children and going back on her word. None of these appearances will reflect favorably on her. She should remain out of the public eye. If and when she returns she will be a target and there will be so sympathy for her ever again. She’ll just be another ‘contender’ without a resume.

By: yankeemom

yankeemom — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:53:26 +0000

If she thinks the peace activists were hurtful and ego-driven (which they are), she hasn’t seen nothing yet. If she were to be elected - there being a good chance here in LaLa Land - she wouldn’t last through the first coffee klatch of the House. Talk about ego-driven!
You don’t get elected by playing nice.

By: Carol

Carol — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:31:10 +0000

Oh Lord - not Cindy Shenanigans again. She’s crazy - nothing else could explain her bizarre behavior and words.

By: Linda

Linda — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:34:45 +0000

Is there NO END to this woman’s audacity. She should be mourning the loss of her son, and comforting her surviving children, instead of threatening politicians with a possible run against them. I can understand her pain over the loss of her son, but ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Is there noone in her family that can make her understand how she has become a laughing-stock over her outrageous antics?
Everyone has the right to express their feelings, and to protest, but, at a certain point, get over yourself.
We are at war, and this is not the time to show such division.
I would hope that, at some point, she would reflect on some of her actions, and temper her deeds and remarks.

By: Snooper

Snooper — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:42:26 +0000

Excellent post! I have moved…again. I am moving from Word Press to Blogspot. Easier to contain the trolls that way.

By: Faultline USA

Faultline USA — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 05:22:12 +0000

Sheehan vs. Pelosi . . . Quite a hoot! Sheehan couldn’t be normal for 6 weeks. Wonder who is pushing her in this latest move?

By: Right Truth

Right Truth — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 04:33:47 +0000

Trouble ahead in Syria and Lebanon…

Syria evacuating citizens from Lebanon ahead of possible “eruption”, MEMRI via Jihad Watch One of the articles in Al-Mustaqbal asked whether Iran’s involvement in the Lebanon coup was evidence of a change in Iranian policy, which had previously been…

By: Debbie

Debbie — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 03:38:25 +0000

Veritas could be right. I hate that she’s back though. I thought we were rid of her. Oh, well, another empty head in Congress? What’s one more?

By: Veritas

Veritas — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 01:46:17 +0000

This could be a blessing in disguise. If Sheehan wins we are rid of Pelosi and Sheehan will be relegated to a powerless freshman congresswoman hardly in a position to make a lot of noise. Maybe all of us conservative patriots should back Sheehan’s election. Devious yes but if the left can use her without her realizing it why can’t we?

By: beth

beth — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:29:47 +0000

I know what you mean! It really is a toss up, but you can’t deny it’s entertainment value!

By: drdisaia

drdisaia — Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:26:27 +0000

I don’t know whom of the two I dislike more, but the activity splits the opposition. This is good and entertaining for the blogs. javascript:moreSmiliesAappendSmiley(’P-)’)
P-)