<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 24 Bows Down to the Religion of Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/08/09/24-bows-down-to-the-religion-of-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/08/09/24-bows-down-to-the-religion-of-global-warming/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: insub2</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/08/09/24-bows-down-to-the-religion-of-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-79600</link>
		<dc:creator>insub2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 05:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/08/09/24-bows-down-to-the-religion-of-global-warming/#comment-79600</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you should have read your source and not just the title.  24 is going green in production NOT plot.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;


also...
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you see the contradiction in these two statements?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

"I love Jack Bauer and all I really want from him and all the brave souls and conniving traitors and spies at CTU is to continue saving the world from terrorists and other asundry bad guys."
&lt;br /&gt;
AND
&lt;br /&gt;
"When I do watch TV, I am watching because I want to be entertained. Period. I donâ€™t want subliminal messages or political prostelizing in the plot line."
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm guessing not.  Perhaps this is because of how subliminal the villainizing is.  A testament to how insidious the manufactured fear of the Military-Industrial-Media Comlex.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;


&lt;font color="blue"&gt;BSC: of for crying out loud. Talk about buying propaganda hook line and sinker. 'the military industrial media complex'? Please. 99% of the movies/tv shows out there villainize the military. And yes, I read the article and understand the are doing 'green' production. I find that ridiculous in light of the fact that the plot lines have a nuke a day at least, generally speaking. The nukes leave quite a carbon footprint, I would imagine. But hey, if it makes them feel better to have a 'carbon neutral' set while blowing the world to kingdom come on film - whatever floats their boats.

&lt;br /&gt;
There is not a contradiction in the two statements you mentioned. I am entertained by good guys going after the bad buys by whatever means necessary. Apparently a lot of people are judging from the popularity of shoot 'em films.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you should have read your source and not just the title.  24 is going green in production NOT plot.</p>
<p>also&#8230;<br />
<br />
Do you see the contradiction in these two statements?</p>
<p>&#8220;I love Jack Bauer and all I really want from him and all the brave souls and conniving traitors and spies at CTU is to continue saving the world from terrorists and other asundry bad guys.&#8221;<br />
<br />
AND<br />
<br />
&#8220;When I do watch TV, I am watching because I want to be entertained. Period. I donâ€™t want subliminal messages or political prostelizing in the plot line.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing not.  Perhaps this is because of how subliminal the villainizing is.  A testament to how insidious the manufactured fear of the Military-Industrial-Media Comlex.</p>
<p><font color="blue">BSC: of for crying out loud. Talk about buying propaganda hook line and sinker. &#8216;the military industrial media complex&#8217;? Please. 99% of the movies/tv shows out there villainize the military. And yes, I read the article and understand the are doing &#8216;green&#8217; production. I find that ridiculous in light of the fact that the plot lines have a nuke a day at least, generally speaking. The nukes leave quite a carbon footprint, I would imagine. But hey, if it makes them feel better to have a &#8216;carbon neutral&#8217; set while blowing the world to kingdom come on film - whatever floats their boats.</p>
<p>
There is not a contradiction in the two statements you mentioned. I am entertained by good guys going after the bad buys by whatever means necessary. Apparently a lot of people are judging from the popularity of shoot &#8216;em films.</p>
<p></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarun K Juyal</title>
		<link>http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/08/09/24-bows-down-to-the-religion-of-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-70927</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarun K Juyal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.rightpundits.com/2007/08/09/24-bows-down-to-the-religion-of-global-warming/#comment-70927</guid>
		<description>I am a regular reader of your article.  And I am very impress with your blog upon Global Warming. Now I am also write a blog upon &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lifeofearth.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;effects and causes of Global Warming&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;. This blog is collection of news &amp; reviews like the study found that global warming since 1985 has been caused neither by an increase in solar radiation nor by a decrease in the flux of galactic cosmic rays. Some researchers had also suggested that the latter might influence global warming because the rays trigger cloud formation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a regular reader of your article.  And I am very impress with your blog upon Global Warming. Now I am also write a blog upon <b><a href="http://www.lifeofearth.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">effects and causes of Global Warming</a></b>. This blog is collection of news &amp; reviews like the study found that global warming since 1985 has been caused neither by an increase in solar radiation nor by a decrease in the flux of galactic cosmic rays. Some researchers had also suggested that the latter might influence global warming because the rays trigger cloud formation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
