Comments on: Wikipedia Defies Demands to Remove Images of Mohammad http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/ Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:33:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: Waco http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/comment-page-1/#comment-127310 Waco Sat, 17 May 2008 18:24:25 +0000 http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/#comment-127310 Hey nizi and other whiners like yourself, It's YOU who cannot show pictures of your prophet, and NOT others. Go get a life! You do not rule the world and say big thanks that your religion is alive thanks to the oil money poured in from the West. Hey nizi and other whiners like yourself,

It’s YOU who cannot show pictures of your prophet, and NOT others. Go get a life!
You do not rule the world and say big thanks that your religion is alive thanks to the oil money poured in from the West.

]]> By: Noel http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/comment-page-1/#comment-115768 Noel Sat, 08 Mar 2008 08:30:56 +0000 http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/#comment-115768 "all you mofo's" ? Is this some homeboy wannabe devout muslim? Naaa, just another mouthy member of the "Religion of Perpetual Outrage". Islam does not negate the laws of this country, and never will. As a constitutional point you have the right to not view, I have the right TO view. This isn't a muslim country nor will it ever be. I suggest you take your "mofo" carcass back to whatever 3rd world hole you came from and practice your religion there. Shove it down my throat and you'll meet mohammad much sooner than you expected. “all you mofo’s” ? Is this some homeboy wannabe devout muslim? Naaa, just another mouthy member of the “Religion of Perpetual Outrage”.

Islam does not negate the laws of this country, and never will. As a constitutional point you have the right to not view, I have the right TO view. This isn’t a muslim country nor will it ever be. I suggest you take your “mofo” carcass back to whatever 3rd world hole you came from and practice your religion there.

Shove it down my throat and you’ll meet mohammad much sooner than you expected.

]]> By: rizi http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/comment-page-1/#comment-115372 rizi Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:29:43 +0000 http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/#comment-115372 all you mofo's don't understand islam so u will die in hell for disrespectin the prophet, all i gota say is i hope i never come in contact with any of you all you mofo’s don’t understand islam so u will die in hell for disrespectin the prophet, all i gota say is i hope i never come in contact with any of you

]]> By: John http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/comment-page-1/#comment-113325 John Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:23:51 +0000 http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/#comment-113325 Hmmm... seems that the news interviewed some islamic cleric who was against any image being attributed as the image of Mohammed, and yet he had images of other clerics on the wall of his office. So why are some images allowed while others are not? If a painting of Mohammed is forbidden, should not all the other images of people also be? This sounds much like a double standard to me. Wickipedia, tell these clowns to go pound sand, or better yet, just ignore them. They aren't worth the effort. Hmmm… seems that the news interviewed some islamic cleric who was against any image being attributed as the image of Mohammed, and yet he had images of other clerics on the wall of his office.

So why are some images allowed while others are not? If a painting of Mohammed is forbidden, should not all the other images of people also be? This sounds much like a double standard to me.

Wickipedia, tell these clowns to go pound sand, or better yet, just ignore them. They aren’t worth the effort.

]]> By: Rosemary's Thoughts http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/comment-page-1/#comment-112688 Rosemary's Thoughts Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:03:15 +0000 http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/#comment-112688 <strong>News Round-up: RFA, Yon, Berkeley, GOE, HRC, MAF...</strong> I have gathered many articles which may be of interest to some of you in different areas of interest. Choose the links to the articles you'd like to read, and enjoy ...... News Round-up: RFA, Yon, Berkeley, GOE, HRC, MAF…

I have gathered many articles which may be of interest to some of you in different areas of interest. Choose the links to the articles you’d like to read, and enjoy ……

]]> By: John http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/comment-page-1/#comment-112450 John Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:00:47 +0000 http://military.rightpundits.com/2008/02/17/wikipedia-defies-demands-to-remove-images-of-mohammad/#comment-112450 Wikepedia, the bane of Academic citation, should receive a medal of freedom award (or whatever liberty sounding name). Free Speech rules! Wikepedia, the bane of Academic citation, should receive a medal of freedom award (or whatever liberty sounding name).

Free Speech rules!

]]>