Comments on: High Heels and Lipstick: Why the Left Hates Sarah Palin

By: are.men.attracted.to.overweight.women

are.men.attracted.to.overweight.women — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:53:16 +0000

Hi good post. I conceive these points might be useful as well. Now the pleasant pick up notes are the ones that lighter the woman. Straight Off one of the lines might just be in all pleasant fun to help break the ice. That is good and it can at last lead to fetching up in sleep together with her at the end of the night. Heck what man doesn’t want that, but knowing what to read and how to pull it off can require a bit of practise. A serious pick up line will take you in the door but from there you have to be self-assured decent to hold the conversation active.

By: beth

beth — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:55:07 +0000

Michelle, the article is about femininity and the feminist hijacking of the feminine for their own cause at the expense of femininity.

I’m not sure where you got the idea that you speak for all women?? I know plenty of women who are not as intolerant as you appear to be - so perhaps you are being presumptuous to hold yourself out as an authority on what women think.

BTW - I don’t remember asking to talk with you - but by all means have at it all you want.

By: William & Melanie Behrends

William & Melanie Behrends — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:37:05 +0000

Based on recent comments by Rosie O’Donnel, my wife and I put together this shirt…

“I hunt in high heels, Too! And I VOTE.”
McCain/Palin

Check it out at:
http://www.ihuntinhighheels.com

Thought you might be interested. Thank you and enjoy.

By: Michelle

Michelle — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:23:24 +0000

I can’t believe that you can possibly have enough confidence to write a piece like this, you are a complete embarassment to women that have a clue. Do you know what feminism actually means? Its a homonym. Look that and the alternative definition up, write a new article, and then we’ll talk.

By: Phani

Phani — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:56:46 +0000

Strong? You call that strong? None of her arguments have a spine. And something without a spine is not strong.
Am pretty sure that Down’s syndrome runs in her family.

By: Phani

Phani — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:54:43 +0000

Q: What’s smarter than Sarah Palin?
A: Sarah Palin on a meathook.

By: Elysia

Elysia — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:57:08 +0000

I am an admitted feminist and a member of the left, but I also LOVE to feel feminine in some make-up and a pair from my large collection of high heels. Sarah Palin’s physical image is definitely NOT what the left dislikes about her–in fact, it would be a positive factor for me if not for the more important issues: her beliefs.

-I don’t like Sarah Palin because she is forcing her young pregnant daughter to get married for appearances, thereby strapping her with an unwilling husband and a likely unhappy marriage.
-I don’t like Sarah Palin because she lacks worldly experience, and her views reflect this.
-Sarah Palin’s views frighten me, from her belief in creationism to her radically (and meekly defended) anti-choice sentiments (yes, I know this is something where we lefties will differ from much of the right).
-As an American living in Europe (yes, I am one of those and, yes, I deal with about as many stupid and uneducated comments about America from Europeans as I also get from Americans about Europeans), I know that even those Europeans properly educated about America and her politics would see a McCain/Palin victory as reason to “give up” on our land.
-Sarah Palin, even more than McCain, would never be accepted as a world leader. And in the modern world, America can no longer pretend it can stand alone.
-And she doesn’t have the knowledge or expertise to lead at home, either. (Nor, I’m sorry, has she displayed the intelligence of Obama to cause me to place this faith in her.)

Now, I know those reading this forum are likely to disagree with some of my points. Fair enough, that’s what politics are all about. But, please don’t belittle our opposition to this politician as having anything to do with appearance. She is physically a very lovely woman, but let’s keep the debate to something much more important in this realm: the issues.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:31:37 +0000

No, we dislike her because she stands for the nastiest form of conservatism.

It’s what she says (when she opens her mouth). It’s what she promises to do. It’s what she has done in office. It’s how she lies. It’s how she misrepresents her record. It’s how she smears her opponents.

It’s nothing to do with any of the things you’ve raised here. You are completely wrong.

By: ElleJo

ElleJo — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 23:56:30 +0000

I agree with everything you said. She manages to be strong, decisive, assertive — all while retaining her femininity. She is the politician I’ve been waiting for. Someone who is in this for the right reasons. It is just a bonus that she is a woman.

By: BK

BK — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 07:19:27 +0000

I actually look forward each morning to see which feminist can top the previous day’s hysterics and how many news sources pick it up and republish. It is becoming a game. A game that will thankfully trivialize feminism for the leftist movement that it is.

I wouldn’t be caught dead in a woman’s study course nor ever want the term feminist associated with my name. I’ve got too much to accomplish in life to wallow over perceived grievances.

By: beth

beth — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:21:51 +0000

Melanie - you managed to twist things around nicely. You missed the point completely, of course.

By: beth

beth — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:20:39 +0000

Sarah Glenning - I’m not the only Beth Shaw in the world.

By: Melanie

Melanie — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:54:24 +0000

I’m glad that Sarah Palin is someone you want to emulate. I’m glad that she represents to you that you can be both feminine and strong. These are things I believe in too. However, what amazes me is how you could in any way think she’s qualified for the job and that the fact that the GOP put her up for this job isn’t a slap in every qualified (good looking or not) GOP woman’s face out there. If voting for her on her looks is what counts with you, if her being a role model to your daughters because she’s pretty and wears high heels is enough for you, well why even choose an unqualified Governor? Why not just pick the most recent Ms. America and have her campaign in her heels, lipstick and bikini?

By: Sarah Glenning

Sarah Glenning — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:37:58 +0000

After reading some of your blogs, I decided to check out contributions made by you to candidates. The fec.gov site does not list any contributions but I found another website which lists a contribution to Obama for $420. I am sure this must be incorrect and I know you would probably want to correct this mistake. The website address is http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com/neighbors.php?type=name&lname=Shaw&fname=Beth

Best regards

By: beth

beth — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 06:56:31 +0000

Thank you Kate!!! I never go anywhere with my lips on either … at a minimum!

By: kate

kate — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 03:55:13 +0000

maybe she did mean “to kill as a sacrifice or offering.” hey beth is her own girl people.

so they are holding up tubes of lipstick??? i am so there! i never go anywhere without at least my lips on!

By: beth

beth — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 03:01:27 +0000

Thanks y’all!!! If my spell check doesn’t pick it up then I don’t see it! Lord!! I DO know the difference.

Thanks for pointing it out

By: 13th Man

13th Man — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:46:34 +0000

A well considered piece, but you might want to sort ‘immolate’ out before some leftie comes across it, focusses on it, and uses it to try to dismiss your actual point.
‘Immolate’ means to kill as a sacrifice or offering. Pretty sure you meant ‘emulate’!

By: Paul

Paul — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:42:29 +0000

Might like to change ‘immolate’ to ‘emulate’ - otherwise, you leave yourself wide open…