Comments on: Marjorie Dannenfelser on Sarah Palin

By: beth

beth — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:54:11 +0000

PK - apparently you believe all the propaganda you see on the main stream news. Try thinking for yourself. You might find it refreshing.

By: PK

PK — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:21:55 +0000

Ugh! You people are twisted. Sarah “Palin was better prepared to be President than Joe Biden”. Seriously, you are just delusional. She is an idiot. Did you not see her interviews. I doubt she could find Washington on a map.
Now I understand there are differences between liberal and conservative beliefs. I think honest debate is admirable. But to try and raise Sarah Palin to some fantasy Republican height just degrades the party. She is a moderate to low intellectual, who got by not in spite of her looks and folksy charm (lacking in substance of course) but because of it. And this is who you want to lead the party.
Seriously, you are people who give republicans a bad name and is the reason why the country turns against this party.

By: home made wind generators

home made wind generators — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:42:57 +0000

Well put writing. will definitely come back soon:)

By: OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:17:47 +0000

i am finding it hard to raise a moral family in this libral world i need conservatism fast - would we be to do this - civil war?

How about moving to Iran or Saudi Arabia, where they love theocracy and your retrograde “morals” and traditional anti-family values.

Nah, we’re not going to bother and have a civil war with you. You’re not worth the energy.

By: OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:14:01 +0000

Sadly, Sam, Skye and fancy: it’s Faux Noise that is so-called “bashing” her, the same news network she so often quoted in her bashing of President Elect Obama, and the spokespeople for the RNC.

Say it with me everyone…P-r-e-s-i-d-e-n-t E-l-e-c-t O-b-a-m-a, who never once stooped to the level of the McCain campaign and Sarah Palin’s own redmeat drippings she slagged through her rallies.

No, Sarah Palin is a victim of her own success…and it’s the conservatives who are turning on her; the “liberals” have nothing to do with the flogging she’s getting from her own party.

What’s interesting is, the same things I’m supposed to be so jealous of as “a liberal woman” are precisely the things we all admire in Sarah Palin - she’s sexy, she wears her good looks on her sleeve, she’ll get in anybody’s face, and dares anybody on any end of any political spectrum to give a damn. I think it’s going to do a lot for women in politics in the coming generation, and I think it’s great.

Unfortunately for her, Americans rejected her ideological extremism, gun nuttery, whacko witchhunting bishop, and fake hockey mom rhetoric, all while wearing $200K worth of clothes.

We will continue to reject the hypocrisy of far right conservatism, in what ever guise you rightwing scum try to package it.

By: regina

regina — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:05:29 +0000

can we take sarah and split our goverment troops and country in half. i am finding it hard to raise a moral family in this libral world i need conservatism fast - would we be to do this - civil war?

By: Sam

Sam — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:45:29 +0000

Sarah is beautiful, smart, conservative, has a lovely family and is successful in her own right! What a combination. We can only hope she would want to run again after the unfair bashing she continues to receive from the lame drive-by media. The liberal Dems can only wish they had someone to compete with her.

By: fancy

fancy — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:10:18 +0000

Thank You so much for supporting a responsible and wonderful woman. I will do all I can from this day forward to restore DECENCY to the America that i love.

By: Skye

Skye — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:30:55 +0000

Sarah Palin represents everything the feminist establishment has labored towards for decades. Her real flaw? No ‘D’ after her name, for that high crime she was condemned by so called feminists and eviscerated in the media.

Despite this all out assault on this remarkable woman and capable politician, the real losers in this race were the constituents of the so called feminist establishment. Among her many accomplishments, Sarah exposed the hypocrisy and jackbooted dogma of the feminist movement. For that, she will always be a hero to real women across the globe.

I hope she will soon move to become Senator Palin in DC, giving her daily exposure to the public and teaching the Senate the meaning of’Barracuada’!

By: EW

EW — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:39:59 +0000

Wow we have some real mud slinging going on here. Serious, people need to grow up and start acting like adults. I am not so sure about the strong femininity of Palin but she held in the tears last night and didn’t give the femininity any more ammunition against her. I think we will probably be hearing a lot about Palin in the days to come. And who knows maybe our next step as a nation is to put a women in the White House.

By: OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:37:02 +0000

I bet that hurts.

LOL

Oh yeah, righwing mama. Come and make it hurt, before we get that chance to take away your guns and give all your money to The Blacks for reparations.

By: beth

beth — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:57:00 +0000

BTW - now that your party is in power, you are going to have to get used to the responsibility that comes with power. That means you have to stop your shrill, whining and obsessive put downs of center-right people.

I bet that hurts.

By: beth

beth — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:55:15 +0000

Wow - you just proved my point.

By: OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:30:34 +0000

Perhaps its a basic dislike of a woman who is strong and powerful but maintains her femininity.

This absurd, wounded battecry from the rightwing defending their Joan of Arc is becoming hilarious.

Could it be that it has nothing to do with “femininity” at all, but retrograde/extremist policies, multiple ethics issues, pathological lying on the stump, and ratcheting up the worst elements of the Republican base to get votes?

Could it be that people voted on actual issues instead of skin color and body parts?

Is it that hard to believe that someone who seems to have ongoing problems expressing herself in basic English was rejected by the voting populace?

You Palinoid die-hards on the right are becoming the very shrill, sexism-whining people you’ve obsessively put down liberal women for, since the 60s.

If you want to know why your favored candidate was rejected, you ought to take a look at yourselves…you’re a laughingstock.