Comments on: Scott Easterling: Obama Imposter (Video)

By: Susan

Susan — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:20:13 +0000

We The People shouldn’t have to find out if Obama is a natural born citizen,He should have produced his birth certificate (not a fake one) without hesitation!!! We have the right to know really where he came from.What is he hiding?

By: scott

scott — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:05:34 +0000

Under article 2 section 1 of our Constitution, president must be proved that he or she is a natural born USA citizen. Also, he had sealed all documentation including his college papers-financial papers and his fake certificate of live birth in Hawaii. What is he hiding? WE THE PEOPLE MUST DEMAND TO VERIFY ALL OF THIS!!

By: jeff mayton

jeff mayton — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:12:46 +0000

I AM SO GLAD SOMEONE CARES ENOUGH ABOUT AMERICA TO ASK OBAMA TO PROVE HE IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IT ONLY MAKES SENCE TO KNOW WHO HE IS HE IS GRANTED THE HIGHEST SECURITY CLEARENCE ON EARTH FOR CHRISTS SAKE…..PLEASE MAKE SURE WHO HE IS……… AND PLEASE NEVER LET THIS HAPPEN AGAIN… THANK YOU

By: jeff mayton

jeff mayton — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:25:06 +0000

I think other people should should refuse to follow the orders of any one that may not be the president but an imposter… this man has not proven his citizen status reguardless of the pleas from the american coutrs and its citizens after all he has been handed the highest security clearences on earth dont you think we should know he is???

By: Kevin Loughran

Kevin Loughran — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:55:39 +0000

You guys don’t get it. He doesn’t have to prove he was born here– he has the required documents. The burden is on the people who challenge his legitimacy to prove he wasn’t. That’s the way it works.
Raising “questions” doesn’t cut it. That’s nothing more than classic conspiracy theory baloney.

By: Joseph

Joseph — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:34:16 +0000

Where was this guy when I was in Vietnam, or for that matter when Bush while on vacation ignored the memo in August 2001 about terrorist planning to use planes as missiles to target the USA. Or when Bush did a disappearing act when it was his time to serve our country. What the fuck are you talking about, you better read about the Korean and Vietnam wars before you mouth off that wars are only won or lost. Sounds like your saying that the nearly 100,000 lives lost in both of those wars were what, because there was no win or lost scenario but kids were dying faster then your dumb ass mouth is talking.

By: Alferd P.

Alferd P. — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:30:37 +0000

Is “Vault Copy” a legal term?

Does Hawaii even maintain hard copies anymore or is everything digital now?

Is Scott Easterling familiar with UCMJ Article 88?

Are Chemtrails real.

Where is batboy?

Enquiring minds want to know.

By: cion

cion — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:09:35 +0000

** BARRY ** BARAK ** BARACK ** BARRACK ** HUSSEIN ** MOHAMED ** ABDULLAH ** BIN SOETORO
** UBAMA

By: cion

cion — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:07:42 +0000

DEMOCrat! - ** BARRY ** BARAK ** BARACK ** BARRACK
** HUSSEIN ** MOHAMED ** ABDULLAH
** BIN SOETORO ** UBAMA -
ILLEGAL ALIEN , kenya

By: RH

RH — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:02:55 +0000

SP MacDonald, You have got a lot of brass. You equate the Lt.s action with a welfare recipient. In the first place he is doing a job that most of the people in the U.S. don’t want and is getting paid damn little for it which is NOT something anyone on welfare would do. Second he is up holding his oath with what he is doing. OB was never vetted properly but that seems to be over looked by the media. You see there is something called the “rule of law” but that is something that so many people today are willing to ignore including you, OB, and most of your poloticians. He is doing something he believes in to the peril of his future and I for one salute him for it right or wrong in your eyes…………….

By: SP MacDonald

SP MacDonald — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:02:27 +0000

Lt. Easterling reminds me of a lifelong welfare recipient who refuses a job at McDonalds, or anywhere else, because it’s beneath them. This guy is pathetic crybaby having a fit because his side didn’t win the election. Wrapping yourself in a fallacy under the guise of defending the constitution is the same as living off taxpayers because you weren’t offered the job you want.
Loser or kook, it doesn’t matter, suck it up and accept the will of the voter or quit (I’m sure the army can survive fine without him).

By: DH

DH — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:27:26 +0000

This guy should spend a year in Leavenworth.

By: Maggie M. Thorton

Maggie M. Thorton — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:55:21 +0000

Marvin, I hope you are right about the Army. I think in this instance they will not want to press charges, but…

By: Maggie M. Thorton

Maggie M. Thorton — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:53:57 +0000

Jean, how do you think a soldier should respect his sworn oath, or do oaths mean nothing, as we’ve seen from Obama?

By: Jean

Jean — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:58:21 +0000

I hope both of these soldiers are tried for treason.

By: Marvin

Marvin — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:34:01 +0000

I hope one of these courts will actually obtain and review the documents.

But I wonder if the Army will touch this as ‘disrespect towards the President’.

My guess is the civilian courts will say he has ‘no standing’ and the Army will not bring charges.

Because out judges are wimps and are too afraid that they will learn BO is not eligible.